Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Lux Executive Summit on Nanotechnology

I attended the Lux Executive Summit on Nanotech the last 2 days at Charles Hotel in Harvard Square. I am used to listening to the academic and technological viewpoint of nanotechnology at MIT. It was refreshing on get a different perspective on the business impact of nanotechnology from industry leaders and analysts. Here are some notes from the conference.

  • Many customers and investors aren't sophisticated enough to understand nanotechnology. Unless they ask, don't explain to them about the technology. Explain the applications of nanotechnology and how people may benefit from them. For example, start off by saying that nanotechnology enhanced-batteries have a longer lasting battery life. Your laptop will last much longer with one of these batteries.
  • 3 industrial segments impacted by nanotechnology are:
    • Manufacturing and materials
    • Electronics and IT
    • Biotech and life sciences
  • Nanomaterials face huge barriers as traditional companies maybe reluctant to adopt this new technology. Manufacturers are more concerned about process change than the technology.
  • Startups can't sell their nanomaterials based on technology, they have to have a case for lowering their costumers' overall cost with minimal or no process change.
  • China will become both the largest consumer and producer of nanotechnology by 2010.

Sorry for the short list of notes, I wasn't really taking notes at the conference.

10/25/2005 11:49:57 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00) # Comments [2] Technology

10/26/2005 10:47:43 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
For me, the biotech and life sciences applications of nanotech are the most exciting. The prospects raised by Kurzweil in this area in his MIT talk last month are just mind-blowing. Maybe we'll get to live forever ;)
10/27/2005 10:16:02 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
Overall, I think all market segments of nanotech is exciting. But in terms of business, biotech and life science generate the highest margin and largest revenues. Nanomaterials maybe the worst due to its close association with manufacturing. Buyers in the manufacturing sector will always want to pay commodity prices for any materials, hi-tech or otherwise. From an operational standpoint, production managers are likley to resist any racial changes to their supply chain or production process. As far as microelectronics and IT is concerned, I do think nanotech is the best answer to Moore's Law yet.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

About Me

My Photo
Name:Samuel Chow
Location:Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Other Profiles

 Last.FM
 Flickr
 MyBlogLog
 Technorati
 

Login

Steal These Buttions

Website Related
IE Tested Firefox Test
CSS Validated CSS Validated
Email Me Extreme Tracking Web Statistics
Blog Related
Audioscrobbler Creative Commons Licensed
Listed on Blogshares  

Page rendered at 5/17/2008 1:49:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Contact Cybersam

Copyright 2000-2008 Cybersam.org All rights reserved

The content of this site are my own personal opinions and do not represent the views of MIT or Analog Devices in anyway. In addition, my thoughts and opinions often change, and as a weblog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot you should not consider out of date posts to reflect my current thoughts and opinions.