Holy smokes!!! I can't believe this. As announced by Steve Jobs today, the beloved Apple Mac is switching over to Intel microprocessor. Until now, all Mac software code uses big endian for addressing and integer representation. With an Intel x86 based Mac, Apple will need to address how legacy code will continue to run on little endian based architecture. Today's software code is highly dependent on the compiler and the underlying class libraries. I am pretty confident that code change won't be substantial and a recompilation on the updated code should suffice. This should ease software developers in transitioning to the Intel x86 architecture. Furthermore, I am sure that the upcoming Intel-based MacOS X operating system will feature an emulator that will enable users to continue running existing PowerPC based software.

As an engineer, I feel that switching from one computer architecture to another presents significant challenges. But historically, Apple has shown resilience and success in implementing 2 major transitions for the Mac. First, from M68k to PowerPC. Second, from MacOS to MacOS X. I have no doubts that Apple will make its third transition from PPC to Intel x86 architecture a success. From a business perspective, I believe that the transition to Intel x86 is a good strategic move for Apple in the long run, it may even provide Apple the competitive advantage over Microsoft and UNIX/Linux based products and solutions. However, I won't be surprised if sales will suffer between now and the time when the first x86 based product is shipped. Who will want to buy a PowerPC G4/G5 Mac knowing that it is going to be obsolete soon? Indeed, Apple will face an uphill battle, marketing and convincing the customers the benefits of getting a Mac now. It is also not clear if Apple will eventually exit out of the hardware business and focus solely in software, MP3 players, and music downloads. In addition, I am not clear if the upcoming Intel-based MacOS X will run on existing Intel PC or Apple brand of Intel based hardware. Let's suppose Apple decides to become a pure software player, it is most likely going to go after the existing x86 PC market. In turn, this can seriously undermine Microsoft's dominance in the computer market. On the other hand, are the revenues from the sales of MacOS X enough to sustain Apple operations? Is hardware the bread and butter of Apple business? I can babble on and on with Apple's transition to Intel x86 architecture but I will stop for now.

So how about it? What are your thoughts on this? I am interested in to hear your thoughts from a business or/and engineer perspectives.

6/7/2005 12:31:39 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Comments [18]

Computers

Tracked by: "zantrex 3 diet pill" (zantrex 3 diet pill) [Trackback] "play poker for free online" (play poker for free online) [Trackback]