Friday, February 17, 2006

How to make a great pitch, a VC perspective

What I really like about last night's presentation on "How to make a great pitch to investors" is that it offer 2 perspectives of business pitch, that of a CEO and that of a Venture Capitalist (VC). Between the 2 presentations, I find Rana Gupta's presentation more illuminating. Here are the main points from his presentation:

  • Started off by disagreeing with Cary. He jokingly said that VCs are not the smartest people in the room. If they are so smart, why they didn't see the Internet Bubble coming?
  • Pitch is like a resume, it's a hook, but it has a story to tell.
  • Each point of greatness has to be countered with risk reduction. Don't use the clique "a great opportunity."
  • Convey how you have reduced substantial risk in the deal.
  • Make investors excited and comfortable.
  • Grab the investors by describing the drama of pain. For example, "the market can't live without this."
  • State your assumptions on your slide - this often overlooked. Assumptions cast off the investors doubts and questions by recognizing what is most variable.
  • Don't splash your presentation slide with corporate icons especially when you don't have any substantive contact with those companies yet. Sorry, middle managers and engineers don't count. Only when you have contacted a decision maker with substantial follow-up can you even mention that you have contacted that company in your pitch. If you do have credible contacts, show them on a table (no names please, just title) and when, including follow-ups.
  • A deal has three legs (like a stool), comprising of the team, the product, and the market. Always build your pitch around these 3 components.
  • Don't say we have a patented technology when you haven't even filed for one or even possess a provisional. Saying patent-pending isn't great either. Say this instead: "We have 3 provisionals, 1 filed, and 1 issued."
  • State clearly the deal (usually at the end), including the terms and timing. Keep it simple and clear.
  • If you have advisors in your team, it is important to tell them how accessible you are to them. Please if you consult your advisor only once a quarter, that doesn't count. They have to be accessible to your enterprise.
  • Finally, Rana in defense of all VCs over the world, causally debunked the fact that VCs are not evil people. He emphasized that VCs have no collateral on you. They are not giving you a loan, they are investing. If they lose it they lose it all. Of course, they want to know about risk. Everything is examined under careful scrutiny. Therefore, every attribute that you pitch has to have a risk-reducing component.

Excellent presentation... I really like it.

2/17/2006 1:04:54 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) # Comments [2] Entrepreneurship

2/18/2006 2:06:28 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Also helpful to think of your product as either a vitamin supplement or an aspirin. Is your product something nice but not necessary, or does it cure a pain? in response to the internet bubble question - VCs are susceptible to the herd mentality too!
2/19/2006 1:51:13 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Thanks for summarizing this, Sam! I'll be referring back to this while writing the $50K business plan for my team.

Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

About Me

My Photo
Name:Samuel Chow
Location:Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Other Profiles

 Last.FM
 Flickr
 MyBlogLog
 Technorati
 

Login

Steal These Buttions

Website Related
IE Tested Firefox Test
CSS Validated CSS Validated
Email Me Extreme Tracking Web Statistics
Blog Related
Audioscrobbler Creative Commons Licensed
Listed on Blogshares  

Page rendered at 5/17/2008 3:01:15 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)

Contact Cybersam

Copyright 2000-2008 Cybersam.org All rights reserved

The content of this site are my own personal opinions and do not represent the views of MIT or Analog Devices in anyway. In addition, my thoughts and opinions often change, and as a weblog is intended to provide a semi-permanent point in time snapshot you should not consider out of date posts to reflect my current thoughts and opinions.